Calgary police withhold evidence of brutality as final UofC protest charges fall

New documents reveal Calgary Police Service suppressed evidence of brutality by officers at the University of Calgary on May 9, 2024. Among this was camera footage from senior officers that should have been examined during an internal investigation.

A line of police in riot gear with shields, helmets, batons and pepper bullet guns at a university campus.
Calgary police deployed up to eighty-five officers to clear approximately twenty peaceful protesters from the University of Calgary on May 9, 2024. Despite many recorded injuries, no officer has been held responsible for use of force.

On May 9, 2024, this author attended a protest at the University of Calgary campus to oppose the genocide of Palestinians by Israel. Reporting from that event noted extensive use of force by Calgary Police Service (CPS) officers against participants, including this author, resulting in concussions and other injuries resulting from strikes to people's heads by fists, batons, and riot shields, as well as deployment of flash-bang pepper grenades and less-lethal bullets.

As of November 27, all charges laid against protesters have been dropped or stayed, after some defendants prepared constitutional challenges to set precedents on protest rights in Alberta. No disciplinary action has been taken against any police officer responsible for protester injuries. Before interim CPS chief Katie McLellan dismissed all complaints against officers, the resignation of former chief Mark Neufeld rendered moot all complaints against him.

Law Enforcement Review Board (LERB) appeals are underway to challenge the interim chief's dismissal of complaints. Except under special circumstances, the LERB only reviews evidence available when police conducted their investigation related to a complaint.

Calgary Police violated my Charter rights, brutalized me, and lied about it
Three complaints submitted to Calgary Police Commission and the CPS Professional Standards Section. Warning: this piece contains graphic video of police brutality. Proceed accordingly. Since May 9, Calgary Police Chief Mark Neufeld has worked hard to concoct a narrative that serves his interests and those of the officers and decision

In the fallout of the police brutality, this author submitted nearly thirty freedom of information requests to CPS and other public bodies to untangle the decisions by UofC, CPS, and the Alberta government responsible for unprecedented police violence on Alberta university campuses. This included footage, correspondence, and other evidence related to brutality against peaceful protesters, repeated less than two days later at the University of Alberta.

Despite redactions, delays, and outright refusals, these requests have revealed policy-breaking destruction of records by UofC security executives, considerable bias among UofC decision-makers, and conversations between then-chief Neufeld and senior UCP government officials named in news coverage related to government corruption. Together, the chief and the government officials premeditated the outcome of an Alberta Serious Incident Response Team (ASIRT) investigation.

Several of these requests asked for footage from bodyworn cameras (BWC) of the eighty-five CPS officers dispatched to UofC. While the complaints were actively being investigated, these requests were universally refused.

However, one request submitted after charges were withdrawn revealed the existence of BWC footage that CPS complaint investigators failed to identify and obtain. This included footage from two senior officers with direct line-of-sight "several times" on this author's beating by police. One of these officers, Sgt. Cody Bell (badge 5046), was supervising an officer accused of that brutality.

Please note that recordings are edited prior to disclosure and some portions may be cut, blurred or muted, as per the FOIP Act. You will only receive information about yourself - all other third parties will be removed from the recording. To further clarify this request for personal information, the two minute recordings will be blurred and muted for the portions that do not involve you.    Complaint # Date Description Fee Requesting Yes/No 1 CA24184440 2024-05-09 BWC of Heck 3260. You are visible for a few frames prior to, and during, your arrest. $25.00   2 CA24184440 2024-05-09 BWC of Hastings 6046. You are visible lying on the ground for approximately 38 seconds. $37.50   3 CA24184440 2024-05-09 BWC of Huggins 5231. You are visible for a few frames prior to your arrest. $50.00   4 CA24184440 2024-05-09 BWC of Drummond 5309. You are visible for a few seconds prior to your arrest and you can later be seen getting pulled out of frame by police. $62.50   5 CA24184440 2024-05-09 BWC of Maveal 4152. You are visible for a few seconds prior to your arrest. $62.50   6 CA24184440 2024-05-09 BWC of Searcy 6060. You are visible lying on the ground for approximately 2 seconds. $75.00   7 CA24184440 2024-05-09 BWC of Phillips 5128. You are visible several times prior to your arrest and partially visible while taken to the ground. $62.50   8 CA24184440 2024-05-09 BWC of Bell 5046. You are visible several times prior to your arrest. $62.50
Email from Calgary Police Service showing descriptions and fees for bodyworn camera footage of officers who watched police brutality incident against this author on May 9, 2024. BWC of two relatively senior officers, Maveal (badge 4152) and Bell (badge 5046), was not examined by CPS Professional Standards during the year-long investigation process.

The other senior officer, Grant Maveal (badge 4152; current rank unknown), was the subject of a 2014 neglect of duty and discreditable conduct complaint that was dismissed in 2021 by then-chief Neufeld.

On November 28, nine months after the initial request was submitted, Calgary police issued its final decision to refuse release of those BWC files. Their stated reasoning was:

"During our final checks for release, it was brought to our attention that the file these videos relate to is currently before the Law Enforcement Review Board (LERB). As a result, we are denying the video recordings at this time under section 20(1)(h) of the Act which states:

20(1)(h) The head of a public body may refuse to disclose information to an applicant if the disclosure could reasonably be expected to deprive a person of the right to a fair trial or impartial adjudication."
Line of seven to ten police vehicles parked along a tree-lined street
Police deployed to the south end of University of Calgary quadrangle where the protest took place, controlling entry and exit from the area.

However, these BWC files were never part of the CPS investigation, meaning they are unrelated to the adjudication. No formal application has yet been made to include those files in the LERB appeal.

On November 28, CPS was asked why files that do not exist in the Appeal Record cannot be released. CPS did not respond.

Matters related to an active LERB Appeal Record, including officer BWC, notes, statements, and other evidence, are subject to confidentiality until the conclusion of the appeal.

This author maintains every previous claim concerning use of force, injuries, violation of Charter rights, and lies told by then-Chief Mark Neufeld and the University of Calgary that were propagated by Calgary Police Commission. Further details will be released as they become eligible.

On November 26, one CPS officer at the front line of the University of Calgary protest made his first court appearance. Charged with aggravated assault and careless use of a firearm in an incident unrelated to the protest, Christopher Huggins could face up to fourteen years in prison if convicted on the first charge.

The resignation of chief Mark Neufeld exempted him from formal accountability, while Corey Hogan's election to Parliament provided an escape from scrutiny of his role as the UofC's head of communications during the protest. No resignations at the UofA, UofC, CPS, Edmonton police, or any provincial body have been linked to the brutality against protester.

It remains to be seen if CPS officers who ordered and executed that violence can be held accountable in a city where police rule politics.

An early version of this story was shared with Paid subscribers on November 30.

Additional information can be sent to info@drugdatadecoded.ca.

Drug Data Decoded provides analysis using news sources, publicly available data sets and freedom of information submissions, from which the author draws reasonable opinions. The author is not a journalist.

This content is not available for AI training. All rights reserved.

Editorial mandate.